4iP Blog

Dan Heaf's photo

Digital democracy

 

“And when it came time to vote, everyone showed up, waiting in those five hour lines to have their voices heard. This is the most engaged electorate in modern times, and encouragingly, it’s the youngest generation that seems to be the most intent on participating in the system. So I look out at that landscape, and I think: yes, the country is in a terrible state, and it’s going to take an immense amount of work and sacrifice and intelligence to turn things around. But the system that lets us choose our leaders seems to me to be as healthy as it has been in a long time.”

 

Stephen Johnson

Since Barrack Obama won the US presidential election I’ve been meaning to write a post (or two) on how the Obama digital campaign transformed the US democratic process and why this is of significant interest to 4ip.

To my mind, Obama’s digital media campaign is one of the best multiplatform offerings of the year and Blue State Digital (BSD), the company behind the digital campaign, clearly have a very sophisticated understanding of the latent power of networks as well as contemporary media in general. Just like the 4ip BSD recognised how open networks provide a powerful force for evolving connections, organisation, participation and conversation rather than merely an alternative way of broadcasting to presupposed passive audience.

Just like lots of web innovations, the Obama campaign didn’t actually invent anything technically new. They bolted together the most appropriate social media and participatory feature sets under the banner of a movement to create a powerful force that bled out of digital networks into the real world and ultimately into the ballet box. Without going into exhaustive detail I’ll explain some of my favorite bits:

Supporters’ database

On February 10, 2007, Obama announced his candidacy for President of the United States in front of the Old State Capitol building in Springfield, Illinois but more significantly for me this was the day he launched MyBarackObama (MBO). MBO is a bespoke social networking site that built not just a political base but a database of supporters who could be engaged almost instantly. Unlike traditional ‘support sites’, this was no afterthought and no token bolt on but integral to Obama’s campaign. For the next 20 months Obama grew a database of supporters from the ground up who could be queried, filtered, contacted and motivated as the situation required.

With almost 1 million individual members never has a US presidential candidate has such an opportunity to take his message directly to voters circumnavigating both special interest groups and the media.

Digital to real world engagement

Once a visitor registers as a MyBarackObama member, he or she can post blogs, join discussion groups, send each other messages, organize events, and create networks of friends, just like other social network. While the ability to contact other local voters and build support for Barrack digitally was good it was propelling users the digital to the physical that set the site apart. The tools provided for calling and walking campaigns were the most impressive.

MyBarackObama Make Calls




















With a walking campaign you could print out a walk list with the names, addresses and map of voters to visit with a script to help guide your conversation.


Obama script




























Critically the site the incentives you, through basic game mechanics, to come back and report your progress so the campaign machine could use and learn from that information. This is an online presence that begot offline behaviour that was all the more important on polling day.

Barack Score Card

































Of course, fundraising was another high profile feature reportedly adding $500 million to the campaign war chest. In the style of JustGiving members were encouraged to set fundraising goals and badger their nearest and dearest for donations. Not rocket science but the right functionality in the right space at the right time.

It’s the platform stupid

Without dwelling too much on my pet subject Obama wasn’t guilty of trying to shoehorn functionality developed for the web onto other devices. The iPhone app was beautifully executed. Rightly, for a phone, its primary function was to encourage you to call your fiends and persuade them to vote Obama. If you wanted to donate it didn’t connect you to a web page where you’d go mad trying to enter your credit card details it dialed a campaign line. The application gave you the latest media from both official and user generated sources while tailoring it for your phone’s current GPS derived location.



obama iphone




































As Obama moves from presidential elect into office we’ll seen how the new administration engages with citizens in a more open and participatory manner. It’s one thing to use the power of the web to inform, organise and motivate potential voters it’s another matter altogether allowing the web to influence, shape and define policy.

Nevertheless, the signs are positive. Enter Change.gov, a site launched just three days after the election that’s designed to continue the social media communication methods leveraged successfully in the campaign. Let’s hope this mean that we see the beginnings of a highly accessible open source government.

 

Ivan Pope on Fri, December 12, 2008 at 7:55 said:

So who are you, Dan Heaf? How do you come to be blogging for 4iP? And who are Jamie Arnold and Adam Gee? And are there more of you? Is there an endless stream of mysterious people who will pop up to blog on the 4iP blog?
A serious point - there is no information at all about 4iP on this site. There is not even any general contact address. No idea who works at 4iP (apart from Tom Losemore of course). No idea where you are based or what you are doing or where you are headed. I know, I know, you are busy and you are working hard on sorting everything out. But my experience in this Web 2.0 world has been that the best startups blog everything. The best startups communicate with their visitors. Trust is born out of openness. And at the moment 4iP is about as closed as it is possible to be.
So, 4iP, with your public ethos - please open up a little. It’s not hard to do. Create some method for input and feedback from us out here.
Thanks.

Daniel Heaf on Sat, December 13, 2008 at 7:33 said:

Hi Ivan,

I couldn’t agree more. Trust is born from openness both in the transparency and communication sense. We know we haven’t got this quite right on the site and we’re in the process of changing it; adding range of features and functionality. Just like all good web 2 sites and services we’re always evolving.

We’re hoping to publish a team page, explaining who we are, where we’ve come from and our contact details before Christmas. In the interim, I post a team update on this blog at the beginning of next week.

However, since you ask I’m 4ip commissioner. Simply put I look through submissions and decide which ones to take forward for board discussion sign off.

Finally, until last week, the C4 restructure has prevented us from really knowing, let alone confirming who’s on the team.

If you have any more questions in the meantime please feel free email me [dan at four i p dot org dot uk].

Thanks

Ewan McIntosh on Sat, December 13, 2008 at 9:53 said:

Ivan, I’m hurt. You only associate Tom Loosemore with 4iP? What about the last two months you’ve spent in 4iP’s (and my) back yard at http://www.38minutes.co.uk (Scotland and Northern Ireland’s unofficial home for thinking about 4iP ideas)? Do we not count? Are we too far away to be tangible?

As Dan says, we’re literally waiting for the site designers to get new stuff up (oh for a Ning wink In the meantime, if you have questions about 4iP you’d already found one pretty damned good place to get it. And email addresses abound throughout this site.

Ivan Pope on Sun, December 14, 2008 at 1:01 said:

Dan, thanks for the response - I do have more questions, but I’ll wait for you to get further info up, thanks and good to meet you.
Ewan - no offense intended. I did dally with a line like “We know who Ewan is ...” when I wrote that comment, but I decided it would muddly the waters and my argument to actually know who someone was, so I didn’t mention you. Plus, I reasoned that you’d know that I knew ...
Which sort of brings me to one of my other questions, which is where does Dan represent as a commissioner and, by extension, when do we get a more local 38minutes (not that I want to cease being a virtual scotsman).

Adam Gee on Sun, December 14, 2008 at 10:59 said:

Ivan, I just hacked into here between rounds of My Gay UK but they seem a good bunch - I suspect there’s good, clean, creative fun to be had round here…

Paul Miller on Thu, December 18, 2008 at 6:14 said:

Am I the only one that found the whole MyBarakObama thing just a wee bit insidious? Yes I am sure that an iPhone app that makes it more likely that you will donate money and badger people to vote for him is a good thing - for Barak Obama. But I’m struggling to understand how 4iP is so in favour of all this, when the whole campaign somehow missed the opportunity to deliver what American democracy desperately needs - intelligent and critical debate on matters of policy. This strikes me as just network marketing for Obama, not some example of democracy in action.

Daniel Heaf on Wed, January 07, 2009 at 4:36 said:

Here’s the team sheet. Sorry it’s a little late:

http://www.4ip.org.uk/blog/4ip_team_now_in_place/

Dan

Facebook Backgrounds on Tue, January 05, 2010 at 12:41 said:

The idea behind Web 2.0 is websites that use a technology called AJAX, and also have a clean/sharp look.AJAX was a term coined for a combination of 3 technologies JavaScript,server calls,and XML.Combining these 3 technologies allows pages to have quicker responses, because the entire web page isn’t reloaded every time.

Add your comment



(will not be published)



Terms and conditions apply to comments submitted to this site

Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?